Holy Cow - I can't believe it has been five months since I started writing this post! I honestly don't even remember what books I've read since January. I had to go back through my library books due notices, and I am pretty sure I still missed some (the library's email system was down for three months so I didn't get any notices between December and March!). I think I've got fourteen books to tell you about (!), so I am going to have to split those between two posts. Here is the first half:
Igniting Darkness, by Robin LaFevers, is the second book in a duology, which is a follow-up to her His Fair Assassin trilogy. (You can find my quick blurb about the trilogy here, and my mini-review of Courting Darkness here.) The series is about a group of assassin nuns, and each book must be read in order or nothing makes any sense. I liked this one a little better than the first book in the duology, but I think that is mostly because the first one had to spend time getting the story rolling, so this one was just smooth sailing to the end. Just like all of the previous books in the series, this book was jam packed with romance, and action, and intrigue, all rolled into a very well-written package. This is a pretty short mini-review, so I'll leave you with one of my favorite lines from the story: "I mean, I have longed for you for years, finally have you, and now I find it has been like wanting a piece of rotten fruit." The king might have thought this about one of the assassin nuns, but I assure you it in no way describes this book! (Reading Level 5.1 / Upper Grades)
A Heart So Fierce and Broken is the sequel to A Curse So Dark and Lonely. I didn't realize the first one was part of a trilogy until I got to the end and it was perfectly obvious that, although there was a perfectly good resolution to the story, the author just knew we would want more so she was going to keep on going. Now, I don't mean to rain on the parade, but this one was actually a bit disappointing. Not because it wasn't fantastic - it was! But this one focused not on the main character from the first book, the prince, but instead on his sidekick. (Okay. Horrible word choice. He was the commander of the Royal Guard, and what the two young men went through was hardly a comedy or flippant adventure.) What the author did for the main character in the first book, she did again for the new main character in this one - she gave you a broken boy who you just could not help but fall in love with. The problem? After falling in love with the prince in the first book, the reader now had to sit through 450 pages in which he pretty much became a flat, lifeless side character. And a horribly mean one at that - although if the author had paid him more attention, she could have put the reader inside his head and we would have understood and (somewhat) forgiven him for his actions. (If I liked using emojis, which I do NOT, I would put one of someone crying here.) Now, don't get me wrong - I loved this book anyway! So you should definitely go out and get a copy of it too, and read them both ASAP! (Reading Level 4.6 / Upper Grades)
The last book I'm going to share has a bit of a longer review - I have much more I want to say about it than will fit into a mini-review, but I honestly don't have the time to go back through the book and find the kinds of examples that I usually put into a full-length review.
Damsel, by Elana K. Arnold, was fantastic! It was so very unique, I don't know if I've ever come across anything like it. The concept, as well as the writing, had me hooked from the very first chapter. It was written in the third person, but in that way that wonderful storytellers use. You know, the way that puts the wonder in wonderful. The way that sets you on the edge of your seat, not because there is intense action, but because there is an intensity to the story and you become immersed in the story itself, and you are anxiously anticipating where it will go. The author has a wonderful way of explaining things, looking at everything from an angle that is slightly skewed, and she has a way with words that makes the mundane sound deep and mysterious and utterly and completely fairy-tale-ish (but in the traditional, dark, and definitely NOT Disney way).Although shelved in the young adult fiction section, the book is for the somewhat older reader, because it is quite risque, with references to particular body parts and states of arousal and conquests. It does it, for the most part, however, in very - for lack of a better word - literary way. A way that makes it all somehow less, and yet much, much more shocking at the same time. Almost like what is being written is so unseemly that it has to be said in code. It's the kind of thing that would make a matron blush. It's the kind of thing that Mrs. Pruitt would gleefully make my senior honors English class read. (Some of you know exactly what I mean.)
And speaking of literary, this book has a very definite theme - one should never try to tame something that is wild. The author does an excellent job of weaving together multiple story elements to gradually build this theme before delivering the final, massive punch at the end of the story. The book also has motifs - eyes, everywhere there are eyes. . . . and cats. What is it with all the cats? Oh, and heat. Hot dragons' breaths and warm amniotic fluid and fires and suns and burning fevers. This is the kind of book that would be perfect for homeschooled older teens. Well, let me clarify that. If a teenager is homeschooled because the school system doesn't offer what they need, then, perfect. If, however, a teen is homeschooled because their parents wish them to remain innocent and naive, then this one is probably not a very good idea.
Now, this book has been touted as a feminist novel, presumably because the prince is a typical product of the patriarchy - almost archetypically so. No, scratch that - completely archetypically so. He is the epitome of the stereotypical fairytale prince, but without the innocent Disney glamour. Not a bad guy, but not a good choice for any woman not on board with living a Victorian-era, married kind of life. And then, of course, there is the heroine, who is not so sure that she wants to live the rest of her life in a situation where she is basically owned by a man. A woman who comes to realize her own value, and the power she holds within. So I can see why feminists would love it. But you know what? This doesn't have to be a "feminist" novel in order to talk about these things. In fact, when I read it, I saw it as more of a historical-anthropological study of human nature and patriarchal societies (no judgement, just an observation of their characteristics) and the strength of the human spirit. So even non-feminist women should be able to enjoy it as well (as long as they don't have delicate sensibilities that could be offended by the risque bits). I've already ordered a copy for my home library, so you can be confident that this one is a keeper. (Reading Level 6.8 / Upper Grades)
So there you have the first half of the fourteen books - all but one of which I had read way back in February when I first started writing this post. Next time I'll cover the rest, and since I've already read them, I'll just need to find the time to write those reviews!







No comments:
Post a Comment